PICC, Midline, Peripheral IV, or Port? An INS-Based Guide to IV Access Device Selection
- daminiglimpse
- Jan 23
- 3 min read

IV Access Device Selection
INS Standards–Based Guidance for PICC, Midline, Peripheral IV, and Implanted Ports
Selecting the correct vascular access device is a clinical decision, not a convenience choice. According to the Infusion Nurses Society (INS), inappropriate device selection increases the risk of complications such as infiltration, phlebitis, thrombosis, infection, therapy interruption, and patient harm.
This guide summarizes INS Standards of Practice to help clinicians determine when to select:
Peripheral IV (PIV)
Midline catheter
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)
Implanted vascular access port
It also explains how Optimus Vascular supports facilities with pre-order IV access guidance to ensure the right device is chosen the first time.
Not sure which IV access to order?
We help you choose the right device—before placement
Key INS Principles for IV Access Selection
INS emphasizes that vascular access selection must be based on multiple clinical factors, including:
Anticipated duration of therapy
Medication properties (pH, osmolarity, vesicant/irritant status)
Frequency of infusions
Patient’s vascular history and comorbidities
Risk of complications (thrombosis, infection, extravasation)
Preservation of future access (especially in CKD)
No single factor should determine device choice in isolation.
Peripheral Intravenous Catheter (PIV)
INS-Appropriate Use
Peripheral IV catheters are appropriate when all elements indicate peripheral compatibility.
Best suited for:
Short-term IV therapy (generally ≤ 6 days)
Non-vesicant, non-irritant medications
Isotonic or near-isotonic fluids
Intermittent infusions
INS Considerations
Forearm veins are preferred over the antecubital fossa to reduce failure
Avoid areas of flexion, pain, infection, or compromised veins
Remove as soon as the device is no longer clinically indicated
Repeated PIV restarts increase failure risk and patient discomfort
INS guidance: If therapy duration or medication characteristics exceed peripheral limits, escalation to a longer device should be considered.
Midline Catheter
INS-Appropriate Use
Midline catheters are considered long peripheral devices, not central lines.
Best suited for:
IV therapy longer than 6 days and up to a maximum of 29 days
Peripheral-compatible antibiotics and fluids
Patients with difficult peripheral access when central access is not indicated
INS Considerations
Tip terminates outside central circulation
Maximum recommended dwell time: 29 days, provided no complications occur
Not appropriate for:
Vesicants
Parenteral nutrition (PN/TPN)
Continuous infusions with extreme pH or osmolarity
Increased site surveillance is required when administering known irritants
INS emphasis: Midlines should not be used as a substitute for central access when central therapy is required.
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)
INS-Appropriate Use
PICC lines are central venous access devices and should be used only when clinically indicated.
Best suited for:
IV therapy greater than 15 days
Vesicant or irritant medications
Parenteral nutrition
Chemotherapy
Long-term or complex infusion regimens
Frequent blood sampling
INS Considerations
Use the least number of lumens required to reduce thrombosis risk
Basilic vein is preferred when anatomy allows
Catheter-to-vessel ratio should not exceed recommended limits
Avoid PICCs in patients with advanced CKD when possible to preserve future dialysis access
PICCs should not be placed solely for convenience or difficult IV access
INS guidance: Central access should be justified by therapy requirements, not insertion difficulty alone.
Implanted Vascular Access Port (Port-a-Cath)
INS-Appropriate Use
Implanted ports are designed for long-term or intermittent central access.
Best suited for:
Chronic or long-term therapy (months to years)
Oncology treatments
Intermittent biologic or infusion therapy
Patients requiring durable access with low daily maintenance
INS Considerations
Lowest infection risk among central devices when properly maintained
Requires surgical placement
Not appropriate for urgent or short-term therapy
Access requires trained personnel and non-coring needles
INS-Aligned IV Access Comparison
Device | Typical Duration | Central Access | Vesicants Allowed | Key Notes |
Peripheral IV | ≤ 6 days | ❌ | ❌ | Short-term therapy |
Midline | 6–29 days | ❌ | ❌ | Extended peripheral use |
PICC | > 15 days | ✅ | ✅ | Long-term / complex therapy |
Implanted Port | Months–years | ✅ | ✅ | Chronic/intermittent therapy |
How Optimus Vascular Helps — Before You Order
Selecting the wrong IV access device can lead to:
Delayed therapy
Repeat procedures
Increased complication risk
Unnecessary escalation to central access
Optimus Vascular supports facilities before placement, helping clinicians determine the most appropriate IV access device using INS Standards of Practice and patient-specific assessment.
Our vascular access clinicians can review:
Anticipated duration of therapy
Ordered or planned medications
Patient history (DIVA, thrombosis risk, CKD considerations)
Facility capabilities and urgency
We’re one call away when you’re ready to decide.
A brief clinical conversation can help ensure the right device is ordered the first time, supporting patient safety and evidence-based care.
Disclaimer
This content is provided for educational and clinical guidance purposes only and does not replace a licensed provider’s order, facility policy, or clinical judgment. Final device selection must align with institutional protocols and patient-specific assessment.




Comments